.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

hilary swank hot

hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Hot Photo Gallery
  • Hilary Swank Hot Photo Gallery



  • Alisstar
    Mar 13, 04:35 PM
    iPhone 4 here with iOS 4.3 installed. No issues to report with the clock.





    hilary swank hot. where Hilary Swank
  • where Hilary Swank



  • Eraserhead
    Nov 2, 11:16 AM
    Apple retail store statistics imply that around 50% of folks purchasing a Mac are new to Mac. ...so new blood appears to be joining the platform.

    I'm sure it's not from existing users purchasing new computers, it's just PC geeks getting their knickers in a twist that they cannot insult Mac's anymore.





    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank is hot,
  • Hilary Swank is hot,



  • Henri Gaudier
    Jan 28, 03:43 AM
    Interesting to hear you say that -- I use the Oyster RFID card for public transport here in London, and it's incredibly efficient. Compared to paper tickets, it's faster to use, faster to pay for, and much more durable.

    Would be great to have this built into my iPhone...

    EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyster_card#Usage_statistics to see just how massively popular RFID technology is here. Only 4% of Tube users use cash, the rest use RFID for their journeys!

    If there's one nation running towards a surveillance state it's the UK. Even the Information Commissioner agrees. What's worse is the UK Home Office has successfully proselytised this to the Dwarf Commander In Chief Sarko who has promised to spend literally billions to emulate the UK here in France.





    hilary swank hot. hilary swank hot.
  • hilary swank hot.



  • DeSnousa
    Apr 24, 04:11 AM
    Great to see so many joining the team :D



    more...


    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Hot and Sexy
  • Hilary Swank Hot and Sexy



  • lmalave
    Nov 2, 12:43 PM
    Whilst it's good to see Apple gaining some market share there is a part of me that does not want them to gain too much. I worry that if they ever become mass market that they will lose some of their uniqueness.

    They still neeed to double or triple their marketshare, atl least. At 5% marketshare, they can still be ignored by many software makers. At 15% or even 20% market share, though, you'll hit some critical point where almost every software maker will port their software to OS X.





    hilary swank hot. Posted in Hilary Swank, HOT!
  • Posted in Hilary Swank, HOT!



  • sportsfan
    Apr 19, 10:03 AM
    Are they given a formal training by apple? Even if they are, every approvers view will be slightly different.....perhaps this app was one that should have been approved from the start but was rejected by an approver who likes to abuse power?



    more...


    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank: Hot
  • Hilary Swank: Hot



  • Abulia
    Sep 20, 06:04 PM
    Cheers for your comments Abulia, I thought I'd give it a go anyway but you're right it didn't work. I just get the flashing power light, a loud beep then the Mac startup chime and a normal boot up. Strange. Oh well will wait for a fix from Apple I guess.
    Or if you have a spare drive sitting around that you can boot from (like an external Firewire) for the sole purpose of installing the update.





    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Photos
  • Hilary Swank Photos



  • fleshman03
    Apr 12, 05:20 PM
    The update, which weighs?

    Weight is other thing. The update has a size of...

    Let's use the English language correctly.

    FYI: it's an expression. LOL.

    OMG, who didn't know that. (http://www.engadget.com/2011/03/24/omg-fyi-and-lol-enter-oxford-english-dictionary-foreshadow-th/) :D



    more...


    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank hot sexy
  • Hilary Swank hot sexy



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 19, 09:50 AM
    Looks absolutely f... f... f... NO. TRUE. :D





    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank To Pack On Pounds
  • Hilary Swank To Pack On Pounds



  • nixd2001
    Sep 14, 07:48 PM
    Originally posted by onemoof
    Someone asked the difference between RISC and CISC.

    First thing, there isn't that distinction anymore. RISC originally meant that the processor had fixed width instructions (so it wouldn't have to waste time asking the software how big the next instruction will be). CISC mean that the processor had variable width instructions (meaning time would have to be taken to figure out how long the next instruction is before fetching it.) However, Intel has addressed this problem by making it possible for the processor to switch to a fixed-width mode for special processor intensive purposes. The PowerPC is stuck with fixed-width and has no ability to enjoy the flexibility of variable-width instructions for non-processor-intensive tasks. This means that CISC is now better than RISC. (Using the terms to loosely define Pentium as CISC and PowerPC as RISC.)

    Originally it was Reduced versus Complex instruction set computer. Making simpler processors go faster is generally easier than making complex processors go faster as there is less internal state/logic to synchronise and keep track of. For any given fabrication technology, this still generally holds true. Intel managed to sidestep this principle by investing massive sums in their fab plants, effectively meaning that the fab processes being compared weren't the same.

    The opposite end of the spectrum from RISC is arguably the VAX line. With this instruction set, massive complexities arose from the fact that a single instruction took so long and did so much. It was possible for timers, interrupts and "page faults" to occur midway during an instruction. This required saving a lot of internal state so that it could later be restored. There were examples of performing a given operation with a single instruction or a sequence of instructions that performed the same effect, but where the sequence achieved the join quicker because the internal implementation within the processor was able to get on with the job quicker because it was actually a simpler task being asked of it.

    The idea of fixed sized instructions isn't directly coupled to the original notion of RISC, although it is only one step behind. One of the basic ideas with the original RISC processors was that an instruction should only take a single cycle to complete. So a 100MHz CPU might actually achieve 100M instructions per second. (This was often not achieved due to memory latencies, but this isn't the "fault" of the processor core). In this context, having a variable length instruction means that it is easy for the instruction decoding (especially if it requires more than one "word") to require for effort than any other aspect of executing an instruction.

    There are situations where a variable width instruction might have advantages, but the argument goes that breaking the overall task down into equal sized instructions means that fetching (including caching, branch predicting, ec) and decoding these instructions becomes simpler, permitting optimisations and speed gains to be made elsewhere in the processor design.

    Intel blur RISC and CISC into gray by effectively executing RISC instructions internally, even if they support the apparent decoding of CISC insructions. They only do this for legacy reasons.

    Apple will never switch to IA32 (Pentium) because 32 bit processors are a dead-end and maybe have a couple years left. The reason is because they can only have a maximum of 4 GB of RAM [ (2^32)/(1 Billion) = 4.29 GB ]. This limit is very close to being reached in current desktop computers. Apple MAY at some point decide to jump to IA64 in my opinion, and I think they should. Obviously the Intel family of processors is unbeatable unless they have some sort of catastrophe happen to them. If Apple jumped on they'd be back on track. Unfortunately I don't believe IA64 is yet cheap enough for desktops.

    I think this "unbeatable" assertion requires some qualification. It may be that Intel will achieve the best price/performance ratio within a suitable range of qualifications, but this is different from always achieving best p/p ratio whatever. Indeed, IA64 versus Power4 is going to be an interesting battle because Intel has bet on ILP (instruction level parallelism) whereas IBM has bet on data bandwidth. Ultimately (and today!), I think IBM's bet has more going for it. But that's if you want ultimate performance. The PC space is often characterised by people apparenntly wanting ultimate performance but actually always massively qualifiying it with severe price restrictions (such as less than 5 digits to the price).



    more...


    hilary swank hot. Photo from quot;Hilary Swank Hot
  • Photo from quot;Hilary Swank Hot



  • ClimbingTheLog
    Nov 11, 08:56 PM
    That's because there is no "L" sound in Japanese, and the "R" sound is what comes closest to the English "L" sound.

    Is there something funny about that?

    Robster.





    hilary swank hot. Hillary Swank is Hot in a Pink
  • Hillary Swank is Hot in a Pink



  • verozov
    Sep 6, 09:08 PM
    hilarious, seriously...



    more...


    hilary swank hot. 12:02 am - Hilary Swank
  • 12:02 am - Hilary Swank



  • Dreadnought
    Aug 13, 05:59 AM
    Hi red eye,

    I was thinking about another little widget, or build this into the folding tracker. A widget that lets you know/or you can see if there was a post in one of the folding threads and click on the thread name and you go straight to the MacRumors distributed computing forums!





    hilary swank hot. hot starlets ever since,
  • hot starlets ever since,



  • MacFly123
    Mar 23, 02:06 PM
    Huh! Could be interesting so long as only Apple's devices are the hosts and not other devices like Android etc. That would follow the model they are using with AirPlay for audio, so it might make sense.

    If that happens though and it is baked into TVs then it almost negates the reason to get an Apple TV box. Maybe this is when Apple would introduce a full on TV set with everything integrated! :D



    more...


    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Picture
  • Hilary Swank Picture



  • citizenzen
    Apr 13, 01:00 PM
    A business can not choose it's customers, a business takes all the custom it can get to make a profit and pay it's employees...

    A business that pick and chooses it's cutomers based upon the customers personality traits would soon go out of business.

    I wonder why I often see signs like this in stores ...





    hilary swank hot. if Hillary Swank is hot or
  • if Hillary Swank is hot or



  • Eidorian
    Jun 17, 06:52 PM
    Try harder. You can do better.What do you mean?



    more...


    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Hilary
  • Hilary Swank Hilary



  • NAG
    Apr 1, 08:57 AM
    If I still watched those channels that pulled their content I would stop to protest. These guys are about as hopeless as the music industry (they haven't been mass suing people yet have they). Sucks for the people who like tv as their entertainment because the industry obviously wants to suck them dry over things like the ability to watch the same shows in your house just on a smaller screen.





    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Picture 7
  • Hilary Swank Picture 7



  • Designer Dale
    Mar 16, 02:44 PM
    [QUOTE=Waybo;12154186]////
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5051/5531424429_1eaf976b56_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/damoncrane/5531424429/in/photostream/)
    I like the crop you used here better than the original post. The frame is broken up with the subject in the left portion and the horses head leads into the right. Nice(er).

    I know I'm a bit late, but I took this on saturday partially with this challenge in mind. What do you think?

    http://gnd.homedns.org/PassingTheGate_1000.jpg
    Very good Tall Ship and the Golden Gate shot. I like the framing with the ship placed off center.



    AoB has the next Challenge posted. It is the last of the original three chosen and one of us will open a new topic thread to cover the next three in a week or so.

    Hats off to everyone for keeping this up and running.

    Dale





    hilary swank hot. Hilary Swank Hot Photo Gallery
  • Hilary Swank Hot Photo Gallery



  • GREEN4U
    Apr 5, 10:44 AM
    Nobody is upset that after 4+ years they're STILL using the chrome back?!?!?





    flopticalcube
    Jun 21, 02:52 PM
    With regard to booting:
    I think a lot of people in here are also looking over the fact that the card reader is on the USB bus. Meaning the speeds you'd be limited to would be that of USB 2.0. Internal 5400rpm boot drive would still be faster.
    I believe its part of the ethernet controller chip.





    dernhelm
    Apr 5, 11:34 AM
    I'm sorry you didn't understand me. I really am and didn't mean to insult you.

    But I didn't put a smiley because it wasn't really all that sarcastic. It was a pretty straighforward comment about how Macrumors posters are temperamental and sometimes hypocritical.

    Including yourself?
    :D





    floatingspirit
    May 8, 02:36 PM
    The thing is that OS X uses OpenGl, where Windows uses DirectX. I'd agree with you, but I'd prefer running in OS X vs rebooting and my macbook running hotter. Plus while in the b.net menus, I can resize with apple + m, and open safari real quick, yet still be in the game. Plus, even on low, the game still looks pretty cool in my opinion.

    Why do u need safari while you're in a game? Looking up a useful hack? ;)





    iJon
    Apr 25, 11:00 AM
    Rich bastard who deserves to be shot 300 times in the heart.. Yes, I hate rich people... I am glad many died in WWII and other wars.. at least they can't take their money which is worthless anyway to heaven.

    Yikes, this post is frightening.





    iris_failsafe
    Oct 26, 02:08 PM
    Actually they are concerned that their mac share is growing and they were not ready for it. Within their creative apps macs are over 50% and growing.
    Here is the article
    http://software.seekingalpha.com/article/12183