.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

oprah winfrey body

oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • ShiggyMiyamoto
    Nov 11, 09:17 AM
    The feature currently doesn't seem to exist (or may be hidden).

    In which version? For Win/Lin or the OS X beta?





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • stevegmu
    Jan 30, 05:45 PM
    You are just embarrassing yourself with that 'source'.





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • SandynJosh
    Apr 29, 10:24 PM
    How stupid can Jeff Bozo be?!
    By undercutting the already cheap ala cart business model the record labels and the artist and writers etc are going to fell the pain right down to their pockets.

    I'm not sure at what price point predatory pricing becomes an issue, but I would think that Amazon may have crossed that line.

    Now, it may be possible that Amazon is not offering the same product at $.69 a song. For example I have downloaded a song from Amazon that I paid $.99 for, and was surprised to see it did not have the same sample rate as my iTunes songs.

    At some point I can't see the studios nor the artists wanting to take an income-per-song hit without having their say about it. If Amazon is selling music at a loss per song, then the FTC might have a say about that.





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • mrsir2009
    Mar 31, 12:45 PM
    Um, whats up with the brown turd toolbar? :eek:



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • E.Lizardo
    Jun 6, 09:53 AM
    sure. apple has no problem giving a refund, as they keep their 30% that the developer now has to pay. that's a cool $300 that apple just ripped off from the developer all to protect their mistake and their idiot customers.

    Proof?





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • milbournosphere
    Apr 13, 02:09 PM
    None for me, thanks. It will cost a premium for the same panel, it will yellow within two weeks, have tons of light leaks, and I'll probably have to used a tethered jail break just to make it play the movies that I want to play. Oh, and it will STILL only play 720p. I'll sick with my Samsung, thanks.



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • macrumormonger
    Apr 12, 12:09 AM
    Currently on ebay as I'm about to part with it. :( What a beautiful lens.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5103/5611212257_8cf1d39515_b.jpg


    Camera Canon EOS REBEL T2i
    Exposure 0.02 sec (1/50)
    Aperture f/4.0
    Focal Length 27 mm
    ISO Speed 2000





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • TOYSTER17
    Apr 23, 08:45 PM
    No such place as "cali". Please try again.

    I think "cali" is acceptable.



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • opinioncircle
    Nov 1, 11:17 AM
    I am a huge fan of my uMBP but decided that the Apple TV just doesn't do it for me, and is too limited to fit my wishes.

    Here is my wish list:

    http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2009/10/091013-wdtv-01.jpg

    And to change from my dying 3GS iPhone, this guy:

    http://www.ubergizmo.com/photos/2010/9/bold-9780-video.jpg

    I have had my iPhone for the past 10 months and still can't get used to the touchscreen.





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • andiwm2003
    May 3, 08:02 AM
    I hope I'm not the only one disappointed that you see an i7 in 3 out of the 4 MBPs, but i7 is only available for an extra $180 in the iMac.

    The i5 2400 costs $150 @ MicroCenter, and that's the processor they use in the $2000 iMac!!! This is why people say Macs are overpriced (and they most certainly are). That having been said, I'll be buying an MBA or MBP 13 soon enough.

    i7 in MBP is not equal to an i7 in an iMac



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • phototech11
    Mar 16, 11:31 AM
    ROFL! No one in their right mind is going to swap an AT&T for a Verizon model when the GSM models are in such short supply.


    Well at lease I will have one to trade at the Apple store once they get some more in...we shall see who has the last laugh.

    I will be at the Brea Mall Satruday AM if anyone wants to trade or PM me.





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • britishempire
    Jul 29, 11:15 AM
    i'll actually be more likely to go out and get a new iPod this christmas, thank to Zune.

    Just to spite MS. :)



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • SMM
    Dec 3, 02:43 PM
    Judging by the progression in the poll numbers, looks like FUD is gaining traction.

    Does that surprise you, or is it just a comment? Right now, MS is in the highest stakes game it has been in for many year, maybe ever.

    The mighty giant has been pantsed. The cut-throat business practices of the past are not only well-known, but are also being scrutinized.

    MS does not have the best PC OS/Desktop and that is now a known fact by many.

    The business community, long a MS stronghold, has grown weary of paying predatory licensing fees for MS backoffice and the desktop. MS does not want to give this up. They want to keep their stranglehold on this market. Purchasing managers are taking a hard look at alternatives, like Apple.

    Vista...so much is riding on Vista. it absolutely has to succeed for them. If after five years, with all of its' vast resources, Vista cannot beat OSX, Redmond's reputation, and credibility, is going to suffer badly. The floodgates may open. The wildcard is Leopard.

    MS could not delay Vista any longer. But, Redmond knows Apple has the last play. Steve just has to love the position he is in. MS has to play their hand and he can come in and trump it at will. At most, Vista could draw Windows even with Tiger, although most thing this is fanciful thinking on their part. MS is definitely scared by what is coming next (and when).

    So, we are going to see even more of this message board trolling and FUD. There are many obvious 'newbie' troll posts. But, I am also seeing some 'moles' trolling too. Some of them showed up many months ago and are now regulars. What they are doing is providing newbie support.

    The newbie comes on with a troll post, and bam, he gets a regular, or two to give legitimacy to the disinformation. The thread is off and running. Another tactic I notice is the thread subject troll. The subject line is written to be very negative, but then the first post is very much toned down, sometimes even apologetic, "Sorry for venting, I know this is rare...", that type of stuff. The damage is done and no one is aware it was a disinformation attack.

    The stakes are high and MS has been found guilty in court of doing the things I am describing. This is not the ranting of a paranoid. I happen to know a considerable amount about disinformation and the tactics involved. With a little work, you can see the same things. Look at the post history for those making anti-Apple posts. The critical eye can discern the inconsistencies in what they write.





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • Minimoose 360
    Apr 24, 03:13 PM
    What product will the T-Mobile chic bash now??? :rolleyes:

    She can bash my handset any day ;)



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • skeep5
    Nov 10, 04:44 PM
    son of a





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • AppleScruff1
    Apr 23, 12:01 PM
    So many people just love to see every issue from the Apple perspective. There are people who get paid for that. Should not you - as a consumer - care more about the gadget you want than Apple success?



    But you're dealing with Apple customers, they sacrifice themselves for the good of the company.



    more...


    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • bizill
    Apr 26, 01:36 PM
    A little harsh here - you don't know if he payed for the music or not and it might also contain movies and other stuff. I know many people that collect lots of music CD's and movie DVDs over the many moons they are on the planet and ripping that in high quality needs lots of storage. Many people try to rip at highest quality possible and that is expensive storage wise. Just don't assume it's is stolen - might be, but you and I don't know.

    .

    Let's just assume it's half music and half movies. That's roughly 142,000 songs and over 3000 movies. At .99 cents per song and $10 per movie, that's $170,000 if he paid for it. And he's complaining about $20 year. Hmmm....





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • bassfingers
    Apr 13, 11:28 PM
    http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/the-white-rabbit.jpg





    oprah winfrey body. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • tigress666
    Apr 22, 05:25 PM
    No "AT&T" !

    There's always hope!

    Why would you want to limit the carriers? How would that make the experience of the phone better for you?

    I mean even if you don't like AT&T and prefer Verizon, how does this affect you now that there is a Verizon phone that there is an AT&T one?

    So you basically want those of us who actually like being on AT&T to be left without the choice for something that would not even benefit you? How frikkin selfish!





    netdog
    Jul 12, 09:28 AM
    I decided to quote myself here. I would like Apple to REALLY do something revolutionary for a change. iPod was nice. A big improvement over what was available at the time, sure, but not revolutionary. And while iPod has been improved over the years, the steps have been quite small. Larger storage, smaller size, less weight, color-screen, refinements... How about REALLY rocking our world for a change? Enough with these evolutionary steps, take a revolutionary step instead! You have the audience, you have the market, you have the brand. You CAN do it! If there's anyone who can do it, it's you.

    Make iPod revolutionary. The groundwork has already been done. You just need to take that one step.

    Hear hear!





    daneoni
    Apr 26, 12:10 PM
    Well that definitely counts me out as a potential user. (Yes i'm cheap)





    julianbc
    Jan 30, 01:01 PM
    Open your eyes to the world and wake up - do some research beyond Fox News!

    Save your liberal banter, chicken little.





    jeevesofRKdia
    Apr 3, 04:46 AM
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5028/5584180139_98845d2cb4_b.jpg
    It'sa me on-a Flickr! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeevesofrkdia/5584180139/)
    1/400
    f/11
    250mm (55-250 IS)

    This photo is from my recent trip to India. I had asked about some gear and stuff before leaving (this is my first (D)SLR and my first foray into more serious photography). C&C on everything I post is welcome, as I would like to grow as a photographer!

    Also, don't peek at my photostream, as I'd like to post some of those in the upcoming days here. :D

    I posted this in the March thread... Way to go, me. We're obviously 3 days into April now. XD





    Project
    Oct 19, 02:14 AM
    How has Apple NOT innovated on the Mac line up?

    - Completely redesigned and absolutely beautiful architecture on the insides of the Mac Pro
    - MagSafe
    - 24" all in one machine
    - Front Row/apple Remote/iSight in every "portable" Mac
    - Two finger right clicking on trackpad

    All of this in the year of a move to a new platform.

    The REAL innovations though, will occur in the second generation of Intel products. THe most important thing was to make a swift but calm switchover to ensure nobody got nervous over the move. Now we are here, 2007 will be sick.